Global Security Watch > Federal Judge Rejects Warrantless Cellphone Tracking

Gahtan’s Technology and Internet Law Blog[Gahtan’s Technology and Internet Law Blog] This entry was posted on Thursday, October 27th, 2005 at 8:06 am and is filed under Privacy. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Some related posts from Technorati and Google.

Wallywaller.com[Wallywaller.com] Fourth Amendment.com:     Citizen-Informant With Scanner Inadvertantly Overheard Cellular Phone Call Planning Crime: A citizen informant overheard a cellphone call on a police scanner and gave details to the police which supported stop. Inadvertant interception of cellphone call was not a violation of state or federal statute or constitutions.

http://www.privacyclue.com [Privacyclue.com] PrivacyClue-Ray Everett-Church on Privacy, Politics & Culture ...: “Even though Acacia used an attenuated method to dial a cell phone telephone number, it nevertheless did so,” Judge Patricia K.

Blogs.salon.com[Blogs.salon.com] Drug WarRant: Petersburgh police (also in Pinellas County) put 14 bullets into the truck of 17 year-old Marquell McCullough, killing him. Cops later conceded they had pursued the wrong man.

Reflected tags on Technorati: Blog, ,