Global Security Watch > Wal-Mart heir dies in plane crash

http://www.ioerror.us [IO ERROR] MGM v. Grokster case returns to district court Posted by IO ERROR under Politics , Internet , Privacy 1 Comment I wasn’t even going to mention this...

Some related posts from Technorati and Google.

[Darknet] Index: Fellow bloggers helped inform my understanding of the digital culture wars, especially Dave Winer, Jeff Jarvis, Jay Rosen, Jenny Levine, Marc Canter, Rebecca Blood, Meg Hourihan, Evan Williams, David Sifry, Joi Ito, Jon Lebkowsky, Anil Dash, Mitch Kapor, Seth Finkelstein, Donna Wentworth, James Grimmelmann, Robert Scoble, Mark Cuban, Halley Suitt, David Rothman, Susan Mernit, Mary Hodder, Kevin Heller, Frank Field, Sheila Lennon, Denise Howell, Steve Rubel, Ben Edelman, Tim Jarrett, Derek Powazek, Christopher Lydon, Leonard Witt, Tim Porter, Morrie Johnston, Lisa Rein, Matt Haughey, John Patrick, Mitch Ratcliffe, Om Malik, Christian Crumlish, Ben Hammersley, Scott Matthews, Dave Farber and his mailing list, and countless others.

Blogmaverick.com[Blogmaverick.com] Let the truth be told”¦MGM vs Grokster - Blog Maverick - www ...: From CDs to DVDs to cellphones to email to cameras to HDTVs, in all cases the move to digital represented an improvement in quality, availability, flexibility, mobility and more. Just as I knew that digital in TV would lead to an explosion in the acceptance of HDTV over time, which is why we started HDNet and HDNet Movies (www.hd.net) the same acceptance would change how consumers bought and used any and all content.

P2p.weblogsinc.com[P2p.weblogsinc.com] Grokster loses to MGM in the Supreme Court - The Peer-to-Peer ...: Today the Supreme Court handed down a unanimous ruling in MGM vs. Grokster, saying that P2P companies can be held liable for their users’

[Iptablog.org] IPTAblog: IPKat: Grappling with Grokster: "The IPKat isn't used to all this economic-style analysis dictating the direction of cases and hes not sure how good it is for the predictability of the law (although in this case he wonders if the Supreme Courts legal framework that it put in place here might well have stood up without it). By focusing on secondary infringement based on an intent to induce infringement, the Supreme Court has neatly side-stepped the issue of the limits of the rule that there is no secondary infringement where the method for infringement also has a legitimate use."

Reflected tags on Technorati: Blog, , ,